January 5, 2005
-
Have You Seen the Elephant?
I. M. Boyd does this wonderful little syndicated column, consists of little factoids–odd things from history or natural science, word derivations, that sort of stuff. Today, he mentioned the phrase “seen the elephant.” He said that 150 years or so ago, when a farm boy went to the city, he saw the elephant. When a soldier first experienced combat, he saw the elephant. In other words, the phrase denotes the loss of innocence (or ignorance–which are pretty much the same thing) and/or the gaining of knowldge, real-world experience or sophistication.
I can’t help wondering if that phrase does not somehow relate to the state of society today. What with media turning everything into entertainment, “reality” shows that have precious little to do with reality, rich sadists being able to log onto a web site and cybernetically kill a real animal, politicians who get elected by selling fear-based fantasies, video games that give one points for virtually killing police officers and beating up “ho’s,” I think that there are many people running around today who have never seen the elephant–they have watched ”Dumbo” a few times, maybe, but have never seen a real elephant.
Me, I have seen more than a few elephants. Even rode on one of the critters at the state fair–and had a heck of a hangover at the time, I might add. And more than that, I have shovelled my share of elephant shit.
Comments (6)
Hmmm… maybe it’s the WHITE Elephant syndrome.
All I know about elephants – except I’ve seen quite a few real ones in circuses and zoos and been up real close, within ten feet, while they ate – is that they are the mascot of Republicans – maybe because they look a lot like most Republicans. Also, they’re big, take up a lot of room and eat a lot. Only difference is, actual elephants are more useful.
I watch some of the reality shows now and then because they beat some of the other crap on unpaid TV, but I remember having to turn the station (usually only temporarily) when beautiful American women and handsome American men, seemingly most of them college-educated, were willing to eat raw worms – good protein that it be, so I guess that’s not so bad, only disgusting to my cooking-programmed mind – but what was much worse, things like “pigs’ uteruses, washed nice and clean if you please (I really wondered whose idea was that one), not to mention the live cockroaches (who washes them?) and live spiders” messed with not for money – though couldn’t blame them for that in this tough world if it’s worth it to them – but for a mere “chance” at winning 50,000 dollars, for the show was far from over and tough competitors remained – I thought to myself, should I fear most these educated people who will do this for 50,000 dollars, or the producers who every week put this into their show? Actually, I fear most the producers, for, what will they put on next? Just imagine the power of money! Actually, I like to think it was not the money so much as the chance to play the game in front of a million people on TV that motivated our highly educated contenders. Or is it a kind of machoism? And, I think the prize was only 50,000 dollars, as on Fear Factor; if it was 50 million dollars I take it all back; we all have our price, even I, and even this last sum might be negotiable, somewhat. Go ahead, talk me into it. (joking, of course, even 5 million might persuade me).
Good point.
Good point.
I haven’t seen the elephant. I have got to clean up after him though.
Have you read Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant?” In it, the elephant has a particulalry interesting symbolism. It is similar to your reference in that when the elephant is killed (a long and painful process) there is a sense that wisdom has died with it.